This is a proposal, not a project under way. The public record behind it is pulled and cited; the ground work is not done. Two things gate everything, and both are named on every page of this site: water and septic feasibility, because without commercial water and septic there is no kitchen and no market, and the county's compatible-use determination, which has to thread two recorded instruments, a 1986 farmland-preservation easement and a 2020 conservation covenant. Until those clear, every site-plan statement here is provisional, and we say so rather than discovering it later with someone else's money in the ground.
What would move it, in orderThe honest version of this project lives on three pages: why the land is idle, which is a structural argument rather than a grievance; the legal path, which is the compatible-use route and its caveat; and the record, which carries every citation and every open question, including what we have not been able to answer yet. The funding page maps which public program fits which cost, and the budget gives rough order-of-magnitude ranges that a contractor walk-through will replace.
Start the conversation