Roughly three and a half million to build. Far less to raise.
Ballpark cost, and why you raise the peak, not the total
| Bucket | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| Design + permitting (architect, structural, MEP, civil, critical-areas study) | $80k | $200k |
| Site + utilities (water, septic/restroom, power, drainage, access, parking) | $150k | $400k |
| Barn structural rehab + shell (the swing item) | $400k | $900k |
| Market / retail interior buildout (~2,000 sf) | $200k | $400k |
| Commercial kitchen buildout + equipment (~2,000 sf) | $700k | $1.25M |
| Cold storage + wash-pack (~1,000 sf) | $150k | $350k |
| Farm startup (irrigation, high tunnels, fencing, planting, equipment) | $150k | $400k |
| Contingency (~20%) + working-capital reserve | $520k | $1.18M |
| Total project (private side) | ~$2.35M | ~$5.1M |
Plan around a ~$3.5M midpoint. The barn shell is the biggest uncertainty; a contractor walk-through replaces it with a real number. The trailhead (~$300k-800k) is separate and county-funded, with our labor as the in-kind match, off this budget. One caution rides over every construction line: structures and impervious surface must fit the 1986 farmland-preservation easement's terms (its text is on order), which is one more reason the program leans on the existing barn footprint.
The raise is the peak, not the totalRead plainly: to make this real, line up roughly $1.2M to $1.6M of combined equity and a revolving bridge line at the peak, understanding that competitive grants and low-interest public loans should pay back a large share over time, but only after you have built and documented the work. Phasing, front-loaded grant awards, and heritage and NRCS reimbursements all lower that peak.
What tightens the number nextLower the peak by sequencing
The shell and the farm come first, cheaply and clearly, before the expensive kitchen. See how the build and the raise stage.
Build & raise phasing →- Cost ranges: 2025-26 commercial-kitchen construction ($250-500/sf plus $40-200k equipment) and barn-conversion ($200-375/sf, and often higher per square foot than new build) industry cost data, applied to a ~5,000 sf adaptive-reuse program. Rough order of magnitude; to be replaced by a general-contractor takeoff.
- Grant offsets: RFSI, VAPG, LFPP, USDA Community Facilities, HFFI, NRCS EQIP, King County Parks Levy, and WA RCO award ranges and match terms (see the Funding page).
- Recycle logic: the reimbursement-based structure of the above programs; the Phase 1 farm revenue ramp; a revolving bridge / construction line.
- Illustrative model; a month-by-month cash-flow projection is needed to fix the peak-exposure figure. Not financial advice.